CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1215JUD001527511
15 décembre 2016
The 1947 decision had not been raised with the parties in the course of the hearing and the parties had not received an opportunity to comment on it.
Page 11 sur 1853
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210JUD004087204
10 décembre 2013
In a hearing on 15 December 2003, the parties were informed that the technical report was not ready.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1217JUD001436406
17 décembre 2013
It allowed the defendants to address it before the end of the hearing ( ultimul cuvânt al inculpatului ). 13 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0918JUD001078108
18 septembre 2012
The applicant requested the Appeals Commission to hold an oral hearing. 13.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513JUD006127310
13 mai 2014
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Civil proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0513JUD001816609
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0528JUD002159405
28 mai 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0619JUD002532611
19 juin 2014
According to the applicant, she was not informed of the hearing. 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD001903707
16 septembre 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD005022407
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1008JUD002839909
8 octobre 2013
Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Public hearing)
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1031JUD002268809
31 octobre 2013
Specifically, it follows from the plaintiff’s statement given before the Slavonski Brod Office of the Croatian Pension Fund on 9 April 2000, and included in the record of the hearing, that he did
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108JUD008025113
8 janvier 2019
Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0221JUD002481617
21 février 2019
The applicants complained that their right to a fair hearing had been breached on account of the domestic courts’ refusal of their requests to appear in court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD006631314
6 juin 2019
Article 6 reads, in so far as relevant, as follows: Article 6 “In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ... everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal ...”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0606JUD007839214
He asked for an oral hearing to be held. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0618JUD002576310
18 juin 2019
He relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, the relevant part of which provides: “In the determination of ... any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by an independent
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0725JUD003780908
25 juillet 2019
Indeed, as concluded by the Supreme Court of Georgia in its decision, there was no obligation for a substitute judge to be assigned to a case or to follow hearings from the very beginning (see paragraph
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD002942217
14 janvier 2020
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA (Application no. 29422/17) JUDGMENT Art 6 § 1 (civil) • Fair hearing • Arbitrary court rulings amounting to denial of justice STRASBOURG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD005342115