CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

507 résultats pour « Elsa GREBAUT »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD003607304

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2014

4 mars 2014

It explained that an appointment could only be made to another judicial district at the request of the judicial committee in question or else in order to meet current judicial needs, upon a decision from

Page 11 sur 26

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003501607

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2010

9 mars 2010

It was only in October   2005 during a row that he became aware of the incidents when M could have been together with somebody else.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1001DEC001283687

Admin. suprême

1 octobre 1990

1 octobre 1990

tenement assignment area obliged the applicants to inform the local authority of any vacant flat they wished to lease and the conditions of the lease, and that they could not lease the flat to anyone else

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD001321005

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2012

23 octobre 2012

  While the Court has allowed for an exception to this rule, this was usually in cases where specific national legislation as regards the length of proceedings had been passed in response to a great

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513

Admin. suprême

19 avril 2016

19 avril 2016

The article had not related to “eviction” as mentioned by the applicant, but correctly to the authorities’ decision to have the apartment reassigned to someone else, a procedure which did not require the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000356668

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 1969

15 décembre 1969

s own request that the case should be assigned to somebody else was to not avail. On 28th June, 1968, the applicant's application for retrial was dismissed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113203

Admin. suprême

27 août 2012

27 août 2012

The applicant was also questioned in detail on matters including where else in the world he had travelled, whether he had voted in the last general election and why he had a commercial credit card, as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0109DEC002249293

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 1995

9 janvier 1995

    The applicant states that the police handled evidence at the scene of the killing with great carelessness, without regard to the possibility of obtaining fingerprints.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC007142812

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2018

4 septembre 2018

    By judgment of 3 May 2011 the Investigations Division ruled that there were no grounds for prosecuting S.T. or anyone else.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD003253810

Admin. suprême

30 janvier 2020

30 janvier 2020

(no. 32538/10) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mr Eldar

Source officielle
CA

2ème chambre A

63c8eed3dc5b777c90992eef

Appel

18 janvier 2023

18 janvier 2023

] [Z] née le 13 mars 1971 à [Localité 6] (Essonne) [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Marie-Christine PINEL de la SELARL LINK ASSOCIÉS, avocate au barreau de LYON, substituée par Me Élisa

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0320JUD001557689

Admin. suprême

20 mars 1991

20 mars 1991

Following a question the patient says that he has for a long time after this event had great problems of impotence. He thinks that it has been better in Sweden.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002466294

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 1998

23 septembre 1998

. – That, having escaped from Germany, he returned to France, however great the personal risk to himself, to defend himself against that monstrous accusation and to try to protect, by his presence, those

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0429JUD000234602

Admin. suprême

29 avril 2002

29 avril 2002

    The case originated in an application (no. 2346/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0721JUD006933201

Admin. suprême

21 juillet 2005

21 juillet 2005

    The prison chaplain stated, among other things, that the applicant moved with great care around the grounds and walked practically sideways along the wall.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179

Admin. suprême

2 août 1984

2 août 1984

Secondly, a Command Paper entitled "The Interception of Communications in Great Britain" was presented to Parliament by the then Home Secretary in April 1980 (Command Paper 7873 - hereinafter referred

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD003969209

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2012

15 mars 2012

All three applications were brought against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 2.     The first applicant was represented before the Court by Ms   L.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909

Admin. suprême

9 juillet 2013

9 juillet 2013

At trial, the applicant’s defence was that the murders had been committed by someone else, though he admitted to having been present at all the murders save for that of the second victim. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003250411

Admin. suprême

24 juillet 2014

24 juillet 2014

Even though the extent of the injury was not considerable, the offence was deemed very serious and could easily have had great consequences for the victim.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2013

14 mars 2013

Even though, theoretically, there would always be a danger of abuse, which might be somewhat greater if the copied material were taken to the tax office, that risk was hardly so great as to be decisive

Source officielle