CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0304JUD003607304
4 mars 2014
It explained that an appointment could only be made to another judicial district at the request of the judicial committee in question or else in order to meet current judicial needs, upon a decision from
Page 11 sur 26
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0309DEC003501607
9 mars 2010
It was only in October 2005 during a row that he became aware of the incidents when M could have been together with somebody else.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1001DEC001283687
1 octobre 1990
tenement assignment area obliged the applicants to inform the local authority of any vacant flat they wished to lease and the conditions of the lease, and that they could not lease the flat to anyone else
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1023JUD001321005
23 octobre 2012
While the Court has allowed for an exception to this rule, this was usually in cases where specific national legislation as regards the length of proceedings had been passed in response to a great
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0419DEC007679513
19 avril 2016
The article had not related to “eviction” as mentioned by the applicant, but correctly to the authorities’ decision to have the apartment reassigned to someone else, a procedure which did not require the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:1215DEC000356668
15 décembre 1969
s own request that the case should be assigned to somebody else was to not avail. On 28th June, 1968, the applicant's application for retrial was dismissed.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-113203
27 août 2012
The applicant was also questioned in detail on matters including where else in the world he had travelled, whether he had voted in the last general election and why he had a commercial credit card, as
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0109DEC002249293
9 janvier 1995
The applicant states that the police handled evidence at the scene of the killing with great carelessness, without regard to the possibility of obtaining fingerprints.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0904DEC007142812
4 septembre 2018
By judgment of 3 May 2011 the Investigations Division ruled that there were no grounds for prosecuting S.T. or anyone else.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0130JUD003253810
30 janvier 2020
(no. 32538/10) against the Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Mr Eldar
2ème chambre A
63c8eed3dc5b777c90992eef
18 janvier 2023
] [Z] née le 13 mars 1971 à [Localité 6] (Essonne) [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Représentée par Me Marie-Christine PINEL de la SELARL LINK ASSOCIÉS, avocate au barreau de LYON, substituée par Me Élisa
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0320JUD001557689
20 mars 1991
Following a question the patient says that he has for a long time after this event had great problems of impotence. He thinks that it has been better in Sweden.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0923JUD002466294
23 septembre 1998
. – That, having escaped from Germany, he returned to France, however great the personal risk to himself, to defend himself against that monstrous accusation and to try to protect, by his presence, those
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0429JUD000234602
29 avril 2002
The case originated in an application (no. 2346/02) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0721JUD006933201
21 juillet 2005
The prison chaplain stated, among other things, that the applicant moved with great care around the grounds and walked practically sideways along the wall.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1984:0802JUD000869179
2 août 1984
Secondly, a Command Paper entitled "The Interception of Communications in Great Britain" was presented to Parliament by the then Home Secretary in April 1980 (Command Paper 7873 - hereinafter referred
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0315JUD003969209
15 mars 2012
All three applications were brought against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. 2. The first applicant was represented before the Court by Ms L.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0709JUD006606909
9 juillet 2013
At trial, the applicant’s defence was that the murders had been committed by someone else, though he admitted to having been present at all the murders save for that of the second victim. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003250411
24 juillet 2014
Even though the extent of the injury was not considerable, the offence was deemed very serious and could easily have had great consequences for the victim.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002411708
14 mars 2013
Even though, theoretically, there would always be a danger of abuse, which might be somewhat greater if the copied material were taken to the tax office, that risk was hardly so great as to be decisive