CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004JUD000983408
4 octobre 2011
On 20 September 2004 the Mayor of Rzeszów once more awarded damages to the applicant.
Page 11 sur 118
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0429JUD001494902
29 avril 2004
It ordered the defendants to pay the applicant and his wife compensation for damage to their property and non-pecuniary damage to their daughter.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0416JUD001025717
16 avril 2019
Damage 34.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001342003
17 septembre 2013
formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: FACTS AND PROCEDURE The applicant is a Romanian national born in 1933 and living in Lumina (Constanţa
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2645000-2889531
24 février 2009
The Court awarded him EUR 10,000 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. (The judgment is available only in English.)
ECLI:CEDH:003-2416105-2613105
8 juillet 2008
Mr Marchowski was awarded EUR 1,500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage. (The judgment is available only in English.)
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1048088-1089587
15 juillet 2004
The Court unanimously decided to award the applicants jointly EUR 200,000 for pecuniary damage, EUR 20,000 for non-pecuniary damage and EUR 10,000 for costs and expenses.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0701JUD000742817
1 juillet 2025
The Court observes that the constant approach of the Bulgarian courts has been that the heirs of a person having suffered non-pecuniary damage could not bring a tort action on his or her
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1218JUD001676109
18 décembre 2012
to the second applicant in respect of non-pecuniary damage.
Pôle 1 - Chambre 3
69e1ce3acdc6046d478979d7
16 avril 2026
[Y] [H] aux entiers dépens ; et statuant à nouveau : à titre principal : constater que Mme [H] dispose de 571 parts et M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0317DEC000188218
17 mars 2020
(see paragraphs 145-147)” The application for damages 26 .
4ème chambre
DTA_2104281_20230414
14 avril 2023
Si la commune de Dammarie-les-Lys soutient que le requérant n'est pas le propriétaire du bien situé au 195 rue de la Fontaine aux Aspics à Dammarie-les-Lys, il ressort des pièces du dossier que le requérant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0131JUD003722507
31 janvier 2012
The Court considers therefore that no pecuniary damage should be awarded in this case. 2. Non-pecuniary damage 27.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1104JUD004377402
4 novembre 2008
In respect of non-pecuniary damage he sought EUR 100,000. 30. The Government contested the claims.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD001889204
22 novembre 2011
Damage 37.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0214JUD001832205
14 février 2017
Damage 19.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0928DEC003996403
28 septembre 2010
The proceedings under the State Responsibility for Damage Act On an unspecified date in 1999 the applicant initiated an action for damages under section 2 (2) of the State Responsibility
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0718JUD003432096
18 juillet 2002
The applicant alleged that a decision of the Austrian courts by which it had been ordered to pay damages following the publication of a caricature in its periodical, violated its right to
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122JUD003859597
22 novembre 2005
(vii) Statement by Police Constable M. Pyrgou 43.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0904DEC001744190
4 septembre 1992
The extent of the damage caused to the applicant's property was recorded in a Search Damage Report Form which the applicant signed.