AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2600511_20260129
29 janvier 2026
29 janvier 2026
a décidé de conclure une convention d’occupation du domaine public portant sur les terrains et les bâtiments situés sur l’aérodrome de Saint-Chamond-L’Horme, avec l’association « Aéroclub de Saint-Chamond
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1105JUD005251899
5 novembre 2002
5 novembre 2002
On five occasions the applicant challenged the judges dealing with the case which resulted in a delay of approximately ten months.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155070
4 mai 2015
4 mai 2015
According to the applicant, he challenged that decision before the first-instance court.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1007DEC001277187
7 octobre 1987
7 octobre 1987
The applicant challenged this decision by a complaint to the Administrative Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114364
8 octobre 2012
8 octobre 2012
The applicant challenged that decision in court. 22. On 13 April 2010 the applicant was officially accused of fraud and excess of powers.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205606
1 octobre 2020
1 octobre 2020
The first applicant did not challenge the judgment in question in the cassation-review procedure. 5.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0921JUD006145400
21 septembre 2004
21 septembre 2004
On 24 January 2000 the applicant challenged the impartiality of all judges sitting in the Zakopane District Court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-156345
30 juin 2015
30 juin 2015
On 3 February 2014 the applicant challenged the investigating judge’s decision before the Lisbon Court of Appeal.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204294
9 juillet 2020
9 juillet 2020
The defendants sought to challenge the findings of the court-appointed expert and asked the court to question specialists Z. and D. whose testimonies would support such challenge.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224540
6 avril 2023
6 avril 2023
Relying on Article 13 of the Convention, he further argues that he was not afforded the opportunity to effectively challenge the revocation decision. QUESTIONS TO THE PARTIES 1.
Source officielleCASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49255
25 janvier 1985
25 janvier 1985
5-1-f), as a person against whom action was being taken with a view to deportation, and that therefore there has been no breach of Article 5, paragraph 1 (art. 5-1), that the applicant was able to challenge
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244667
21 juillet 2025
21 juillet 2025
Relying on Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention the applicant complains that domestic law does not provide for the right of access to a court for someone in his situation who wishes to challenge the seizure
Source officielleciv1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2016:C110519
3 novembre 2016
3 novembre 2016
P..., domiciliée [...] , contre l'arrêt rendu le 16 avril 2015 par la cour d'appel d'Aix-en-Provence (1re chambre B), dans le litige l'opposant à la société Chaland Giovannoni, société d'exercice libéral
Source officielle1ère chambre
DCA_22PA03610_20231207
7 décembre 2023
7 décembre 2023
décision du 14 février 2020, par laquelle le ministre de l'agriculture et de l'alimentation a autorisé la mise sur le marché provisoire, du 14 février au 13 juin 2020, du produit phytopharmaceutique " Challenge
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2293
15 janvier 2008
15 janvier 2008
The alleged defect in the relevant law which had made it impossible to challenge a judge on the basis of his or her relationship with a party’s advocate was a matter of sufficient general interest.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0511DEC004684599
11 mai 2004
11 mai 2004
On 24 January 1995 a three-judge Chamber of the Supreme Court ( Najvyšší súd ) presided over by judge Dz. dismissed the applicants' challenge of the City Court judges.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0516JUD003417007
16 mai 2017
16 mai 2017
The applicant contended under Article 5 § 4 of the Convention that there was no remedy in domestic law by which he could challenge the lawfulness of his pre-trial detention. 16.
Source officielleTribunal Administratif de Lyon
DTA_2509170_20260403
3 avril 2026
3 avril 2026
Dans ces conditions, il y a lieu de laisser en la cause G..., la commune de Saint-Chamond et Saint-Etienne Métropole dont la présence apparaît, en l’état de l’instruction utile.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0322DEC001776706
22 mars 2016
22 mars 2016
On 24 June 2003 the applicant challenged the refusal of 20 May 2003 before the District Court. 32.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1125DEC000878304
25 novembre 2008
25 novembre 2008
No specific challenge was raised to the accounts of events contained in the testimonies of other absentee victims.
Source officiellePage 109 sur 1049
Challend De Cevins, Mathias
10/02/2026
Voir →
EARL DE CHALLENDEAU
16/08/2025
Voir →
COUDRE-EN-LIGNE.COM, CHALLENDE, Cécile
07/10/2016
Voir →
COUDRE-EN-LIGNE.COM, CHALLENDE, Cécile
27/01/2011
Voir →