CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

45 831 résultats pour « Stuck »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC004601406

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

I have the honour of observing that the case can certainly be struck out of the Court’s list of cases according to Article 37 § 1 letter a) of the Convention or declared inadmissible according to Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003437804

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC003707506

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC001997805

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0515DEC001204103

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2007

15 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article   29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD005764600

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2007

22 mai 2007

    Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0522JUD005837000

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2007

22 mai 2007

    Accordingly, the applications should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0524DEC001822103

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2007

24 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0605DEC002849503

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2007

5 juin 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD006411100

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD007654201

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

    Accordingly, the application should be disjoined and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614DEC002724104

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2007

14 juin 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0502DEC001357804

Admin. suprême

2 mai 2007

2 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC001573904

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0503DEC001149204

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

they have failed to respond to the communications from the Court, the last of which was a registered letter dated 19 February 2006 warning the applicants of the possibility that their case might be struck

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0509DEC003182803

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2007

9 mai 2007

They agree to have the application struck out of the list of pending cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC000230507

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC001556602

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0510DEC001072202

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2007

10 mai 2007

Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list and the application of Article 29 § 3 to it discontinued.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2737

Admin. suprême

22 mai 2007

22 mai 2007

Judgment 22.5.2007 [Section IV] Article 37 Article 37-1-c Continued examination not justified Applicant's failure to keep the Court informed of developments relevant to her application: admissible case struck

Source officielle

Page 108 sur 2292

← PrécédentSuivant →