CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

3 385 résultats pour « Callige »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0718JUD002652119

Admin. suprême

18 juillet 2024

18 juillet 2024

10 (1) - conviction for making calls to participate in public events - arrest, conviction under Article 20.2 § 2 of the CAO, administrative detention of 10 days for publishing messages on Instagram calling

Page 108 sur 170

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253cc22bd3db21cbdd8f394

Appel

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

en oeuvre de fourreaux pour alimentation électrique fixés sur les treillis ; qu'l explique l'affleurement du treillis au premier et deuxième sous-sol, par un enrobage insuffisant ou par un mauvais calage

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601DEC000160302

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2006

1 juin 2006

On 17   July 2003 the Moscow City Court upheld the decision of 14   April 2003 indicating that there were no circumstances calling for the applicant’s release.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0902DEC001931207

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2014

2 septembre 2014

The Court reiterates that it is not its task to act as an appeal court of “ fourth instance” by calling into question the outcome of the domestic proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235233

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2024

25 juin 2024

extraordinary remedy under domestic law permitting the re ‑ examination of a case resolved by final judgment or decision in the event of the emergence of relevant new facts or circumstances capable of calling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0609JUD002323894

Admin. suprême

9 juin 1997

9 juin 1997

  The court declined to follow prosecuting counsel's submissions calling for the defendants' acquittal.   It held as follows:         "...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-202151

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2020

6 mars 2020

The Northern Ireland Assembly voted for the third time on the issue on 29 April 2014 and rejected the motion calling for the introduction of same ‑ sex marriage in Northern Ireland by a narrow margin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0126JUD006080209

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2017

26 janvier 2017

Article 226 Rules governing calling [persons] for questioning “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1004DEC005597713

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2016

4 octobre 2016

It submitted that the defendants were, by stigmatising the applicant and by calling on the public to “combat against the far right” ( Kampf gegen Rechts ), also at the origin of and hence responsible for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1124DEC007259601

Admin. suprême

24 novembre 2005

24 novembre 2005

Under Article 6 of the Convention the applicant complained that her case had been examined by the first instance court without calling the experts, despite the experts’ conclusions being crucial to the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0113JUD002255404

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2011

13 janvier 2011

    The Court recalls that it is not its task to act by calling into question the outcome of the domestic proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-233563

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

Türkiye 28/01/2021 Muhammet Duran ÇALIK 1992 Konya Turkish Rukiye COŞGUN 180. 9759/21 Ersoy v. Türkiye 05/02/2021 Levent ERSOY 1989 İzmir Turkish Halil ÇETİN 181. 9811/21 Kırsoy v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-154291

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2015

8 avril 2015

Š.A. and F.M. had started hitting him, while he was calling for help and trying to escape them. His sons, standing nearby, heard his cries and came to his aid.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157726

Admin. suprême

7 septembre 2015

7 septembre 2015

hear participants in the case, to examine evidence, as well as to “carry out other necessary procedural measures aimed at verifying admissibility and authenticity of evidence, in particular by way of calling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0611DEC005793918

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2019

11 juin 2019

It held that calling the applicant party a “ Prüffall ” necessitated a statutory basis, for it was capable of impeding the applicant’s chances in political competitions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002562994

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 1996

16 janvier 1996

context of these remedies could, in accordance with the relevant case-law of the Federal Constitutional Court, be justified in cases of a danger of repetition, arbitrariness or discriminatory effects calling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0510DEC004631199

Admin. suprême

10 mai 2001

10 mai 2001

About a week before the trial Mr Christie’s lawyers indicated that they intended to make an application to the trial judge seeking to prevent the applicant from calling a number of witnesses, including

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144074

Admin. suprême

14 avril 2014

14 avril 2014

It noted that Article 351 § 1 of the CCP was one of the elements fostering the guarantees of impartiality of a judge and that in the circumstances of the case there were no circumstances calling into question

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229916

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

actions aimed at discrediting the use of the Russian Armed Forces) / Sverdlovsk Regional Court / 21/12/2022 / fine of RUB 40,000; 5) Posting a picture of a car with the signs "Z" and "V" online and calling

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-230563

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2024

11 janvier 2024

written statements the conviction was based - all sets of proceedings,   Art. 10 (1) - various restrictions on the right to freedom of expression - 11/09/2021, Vladimir, distribution of leaflets calling

Source officielle