CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

45 831 résultats pour « Stuck »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC003192503

Admin. suprême

2 mars 2006

2 mars 2006

In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC001274503

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC001278002

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309DEC000868704

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2006

9 mars 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0309DEC000943404

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2006

9 mars 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0314DEC001217103

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2006

14 mars 2006

Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0321DEC006647101

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2006

21 mars 2006

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC001848902

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC006920701

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

The application should therefore be struck out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC006703001

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

The application should therefore be struck out of the list of cases in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328DEC007610001

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0328JUD006750601

Admin. suprême

28 mars 2006

28 mars 2006

By reference to Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention, the Court considers that the application should be struck out of its list of cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0406DEC002696904

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2006

6 avril 2006

Struck out of the list

Résumé IA — à vérifier
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC000699302

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2007

10 avril 2007

Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD007503801

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

    Accordingly, the application should be disjoined and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD007503701

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

    Accordingly, the application should be disjoined and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD007503501

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

    Accordingly, the application should be disjoined and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412JUD007503001

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

    Accordingly, the application should be disjoined and the case struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (b) of the Convention. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412DEC000726805

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

Accordingly, the application of Article 29   §   3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0424JUD004066398

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2007

24 avril 2007

satisfaction in respect of the non-pecuniary damage. ...The Government shall pay the applicant MDL 186,945 [1] ... and MDL 187,432 [2] ... within three months from the date on which this case will be struck

Source officielle

Page 107 sur 2292

← PrécédentSuivant →