Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215DEC003827702
15 février 2007
15 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215DEC002533302
15 février 2007
15 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC001120304
20 février 2007
20 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC000281204
20 février 2007
20 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC002049502
20 février 2007
20 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0220DEC000993303
20 février 2007
20 février 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC000924604
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
Struck out of the list
Résumé IA — à vérifierCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0306DEC003677802
6 mars 2007
6 mars 2007
to respond to further communications from the Registry of the Court, the last of which was a registered letter dated 17 October 2006 warning the applicant of the possibility that his case might be struck
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0315JUD002184604
15 mars 2007
15 mars 2007
Accordingly, the case should be struck out of the list. FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY 1. Decides to strike the case out of the list; 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0329DEC003775105
29 mars 2007
29 mars 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC006084500
3 avril 2007
3 avril 2007
The Court notes that, on 2 January 2007, the applicant was reminded that the period allowed for submission of his written observations had expired and warned of the possibility that the case might be struck
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0403DEC003383804
3 avril 2007
3 avril 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405DEC003340402
5 avril 2007
5 avril 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0410DEC003016204
10 avril 2007
10 avril 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0223DEC002626403
23 février 2006
23 février 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3486
28 février 2006
28 février 2006
.) - 2476/02 Decision 28.2.2006 [Section II] Article 34 Locus standi Locus standi of a person who is not a family member of the deceased applicant: struck out The applicant died three years after
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0228DEC002143203
28 février 2006
28 février 2006
Accordingly, the application to the case of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should be discontinued and the case struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC000654902
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC003474604
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC002081203
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officiellePage 106 sur 2292
Stucker, Benjamin Philippe
16/07/2026
Voir →
Gruner Stucky SA
17/06/2026
Voir →
SCP BENICHOU & STUCKER
14/06/2026
Voir →
STUCKLE
12/06/2026
Voir →
CENTRE DE SOINS INFIRMIERS DE STUCKANGE LES ABEILLES
17/05/2026
Voir →