Freedom to manifest one’s religion was a fundamental right: not only because a healthy democratic society needs to tolerate and sustain pluralism and diversity, but also because of the importance to an

D.L. and V.L. requested the court to annul the applicant’s refusal of 27 May 2008 and to find that he had in fact accepted the inheritance because he was using his late mother’s property.

The applicant was found ineligible for that allowance not because she did not have the requisite degree of disability but because she did not have a sufficient period of social cover as required by the

In addition, at all levels the applicant company argued that the preconditions for restitution in kind had not been met, most notably because “a complex of construction works” had been carried out on the

Lithuanian courts in which the applicant asked that his son’s place of residence be determined with him, the courts held that they did not have the jurisdiction to change the child’s place of residence because

He also explains that he was unable to appeal against the decision of 10 August 2011 because he was immediately admitted to the psychiatric hospital.

The court went on to hold that, again because of the excessive duration of the proceedings, it was appropriate further to mitigate the punishment by suspending its execution.

They also established that the HIV had not been detected because the medical staff had failed to test the blood because of the expense of doing so and that, prior to the first applicant’s infection, there

There was no curtains on the window and the applicant had difficulty sleeping because of the midnight twilight which started in the middle of May and continued until July.

The bailiff reasoned that the Service had already paid the applicant AMD 1,197,748, while the reinstatement of the applicant in her previous position in the Service was impossible, because that position

relying on Article   14 (prohibition of discrimination) taken together with Article   8 (right to respect for private and family life) - that they had been refused maternity benefits in 2005 because

connection that the applicant cannot benefit from a three-month extension of a six-month period granted by the President of the Court for applications brought during the outbreak of COVID pandemic because

The applicant started administrative court proceedings, arguing that his right to property was breached because of the authorities’ mistakes and delay to act, which led to a situation where restitution

    The applicants complained that their removal to Italy would be in breach of Article 3 of the Convention because of alleged deficiencies in the reception system for asylum-seekers. 5.

Mr P. acknowledged that he had hit the applicants’ daughter and her son and explained that he had not been able to see them because they had been crossing the road in violation of traffic rules.

of the proceedings to contest the paternity of the putative father: violation Facts – The applicant was unable to bring an action to establish paternity on the part of her alleged biological father because

The validity of the orders to leave the country was subsequently extended by four months because the mother was pregnant and about to give birth.

They submitted that they had sold the property to company VB because they had been deceived: the applicants had intended to divide the land into two separate plots and sell one of them, but the second

However, by a decision of the prosecutor in charge of the case of 30 March 2010, the applicant was discharged because the evidence gathered during investigation did not prove his guilt in committing the