CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0515JUD006252615
15 mai 2018
On 10 November 2015 the bailiff imposed an execution fee on R.M. of RUB 5,000 for failure to comply with the judgment of 25 June 2014.
Page 105 sur 241
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0630JUD005309910
30 juin 2020
Pour les frais afférents à la procédure ayant abouti à l’annulation de son droit de propriété, le requérant réclame 150 000 RUB pour les honoraires d’avocat et 14 999 RUB pour
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0320JUD001533902
20 mars 2008
La perte d’un appartement d’une pièce, de deux pièces ou de trois pièces donnait lieu au paiement d’une somme de respectivement 15 000 roubles (RUB), 20 000 RUB ou de 45 000 RUB au
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0614JUD000998813
14 juin 2022
Le montant minimal de l’amende pour ces infractions fut fixé à 300 000 RUB et le montant maximal à 500 000 RUB (12 450 EUR). 25 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0925JUD001969202
25 septembre 2008
The head had agreed to pay RUB 200,000.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0115JUD004385212
15 janvier 2019
It has therefore been established “beyond reasonable doubt” that the applicant was hit several times with rubber truncheons by the warders. 43.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD004865618
12 janvier 2023
Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, fine of RUB 10,000.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0923DEC002745109
23 septembre 2010
It found that the Russian authorities had violated his right by delaying the enforcement of the judgment of 31 May 2007 and awarded him RUB 40,000 in compensation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0905JUD001086918
5 septembre 2024
20.2 § 2 of the CAO for calls to participate in an unauthorised manifestation on 31/01/2021 in support of Navalnyy, published in Vkontakte; final decision: Vologda Regional Court on 11/03/2021, fine of RUB
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0209JUD002248605
9 février 2016
Mr Fateyev claimed RUB 180,000 (about EUR 2,400), Mr Kodola claimed RUB 98,144 (about EUR 1,300) and Mr Dymov claimed RUB 214,621 (about EUR 3,000) for costs and expenses incurred
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0225JUD002482706
25 février 2010
Each of the applicants claimed 1,200,000 Russian roubles (RUB) for the loss of the flat and loss of their right to acquire that flat by way of privatisation; RUB 63,000 in respect of the
civ2
613723c4cd5801467740de41
7 juin 2001
Rui Z... X..., demeurant chez Mme Chen A..., ..., défendeur à la cassation ; LA COUR, en l'audience publique du 10 mai 2001, où étaient présents : M.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0106DEC004291698
6 janvier 2000
; margin-bottom:0pt; font-size:10pt } QUATRIÈME SECTION DÉCISION FINALE [Note1] SUR LA RECEVABILITÉ de la requête n° 42916/98 présentée par Jaume TORRENTS BAUZA, Felipe BORRALLO RUBIO
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0112JUD007407616
Conviction under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO to fine of RUB 10,000.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0226JUD001466221
26 février 2026
xa0; (iii) 07/09/2022, Moscow City Court (i) administrative detention of 15 days, (ii) fine of RUB
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-167919
29 septembre 2016
At the hearing the applicant maintained his claim, stating that in monetary terms his non-pecuniary damage amounted to RUB 500,000 (approximately EUR 11,000).
ECLI:CEDH:001-169589
17 novembre 2016
On 26 December 2007 the head of Moscow tax office no. 28, Ms S., had authorised an overnight transfer of more than 5.4 billion Russian roubles (RUB – over 150 million euros (EUR)).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC000944111
23 mars 2021
damage and RUB 165,159 in respect of pecuniary damage.
ECLI:CEDH:001-116881
28 janvier 2013
Two post-mortem examinations revealed that he had been shot by a rubber bullet measuring 2x5 centimetres.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0121DEC001161710
21 janvier 2020
He claimed 1,450,000 roubles (RUB) in respect of non ‑ pecuniary damage and RUB 55,546.49 in respect of pecuniary damage. 17.