CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

45 102 résultats pour « Alfred »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0401JUD004532217

Admin. suprême

1 avril 2021

1 avril 2021

    The person who is alleged to have mistreated the applicants in the police car (Officer J.C.) is also alleged to have been involved in the mistreatment at the police station. 4.

Source officielle

Page 105 sur 2256

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0303JUD003337307

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2020

3 mars 2020

Mr Prisyazhnyy’s alleged ill-treatment on 14 January 2014 110.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524DEC003630910

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2016

24 mai 2016

On 11 May 2007 details concerning Mr D.T.’s alleged financial relations with S. had been published in a weekly newspaper.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5074

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2002

18 décembre 2002

The applicant was subsequently acquitted on the ground that the alleged facts had never occurred.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-6980

Admin. suprême

9 mai 2000

9 mai 2000

racial prejudice of jurors: violation Facts : During the trial of the applicant, an Asian, one of the jurors wrote a note to the court in which he alleged that at least two of the other jurors had made

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11636

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2017

23 mai 2017

proceedings for compensation for terrorist acts: violation Facts – On 21   December 2006 the applicant brought proceedings against the national authorities to obtain compensation for damage she alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12888

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2020

30 juin 2020

Judgment 30.6.2020 [Section IV] Article 14 Discrimination Alleged discrimination in provision of disability benefits to civilian as opposed to military beneficiaries: no violation Facts – The applications

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0308DEC005598416

Admin. suprême

8 mars 2018

8 mars 2018

In particular, the Court notes that the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment through his placement in a metal cage took place during the first-instance hearing, which finished on 2 September 2015, and the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10327

Admin. suprême

9 décembre 2014

9 décembre 2014

The article described Stalin as a “bloodthirsty cannibal” and also alleged that the Soviet leaders had “evaded moral responsibility for the extremely serious crime”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13649

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2021

17 mars 2021

Switzerland (relinquishment) - 53600/20   Article 2 Positive obligations Alleged failings in the prevention of global warming: relinquishment in favour of the Grand Chamber Article 6 Administrative

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-189314

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2018

13 décembre 2018

  It further relates to the applicant’s alleged inability to examine or have examined the witnesses against him (see Schatschaschwili v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0903DEC000747313

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2020

3 septembre 2020

The applicant’s complaints under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the alleged breach of the procedure for his arrest and the alleged absence of a court decision authorising his detention for

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-177851

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

It further concerns the alleged unfairness of the criminal proceedings due to the systemic restriction imposed on the applicant’s right of access to a lawyer during the pre-trial stage pursuant to Law

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-209420

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2021

26 mars 2021

On 21 September 2016 the applicant was arrested in Ankara for his alleged links to FETÖ/PDY (Fetullahist Terror Organisation / Parallel State Structure).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-49208

Admin. suprême

1 mai 1969

1 mai 1969

detention pending trial and during the judicial proceedings instituted against him in Austria;   Whereas the Commission on 29 March 1966 declared the application admissible insofar as it related to alleged

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243811

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2025

19 mai 2025

The application further pertains to an alleged breach of Article 6 §   3 (d) of the Convention due to the applicant’s inability to examine certain witnesses (namely S.A.Ş., M.Ş. and L.M.) in person

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-213895

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2021

10 novembre 2021

On 9 April 2019 the applicant’s objection against the initial deportation order was upheld insofar as it concerned the first deportation ground, as the alleged risk to public order was considered to be

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-224

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 1999

21 janvier 1999

Greece [GC] - 28802/95 Judgment 21.1.1999 Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Alleged secret surveillance of Jehovah’s Witnesses: struck out   Article 9 Article 9-1 Freedom of religion

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-178624

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2017

19 octobre 2017

It further pertains to the alleged failure to inform the applicants of his basic rights prior to those investigative measures (see, mutatis mutandis , Hakan Duman v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1123DEC001246208

Admin. suprême

23 novembre 2010

23 novembre 2010

  Reine The applicant complained, in particular, about an alleged ill-treatment during police detention, the alleged lack of prompt and thorough investigation in that regard and about the alleged

Source officielle