CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13082
12 janvier 2021
The judge’s activities had not concerned the merits of the case, and their decisions had neither aimed at determining the essential elements of the alleged criminal offence, namely the act in question,
Page 104 sur 2856
4 / 1 SSR
CETAT:CETATEXT000007706567
17 juin 1988
X..., le jury a fait erreur sur la nationalité du requérant ou fondé son appréciation sur un motif autre que ceux tirés de l'examen des titres et mérites des candidats ; que l'appréciation qu'il a ainsi
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1967:0209JUD000147462
9 février 1967
Purely subsidiary, the Government requests that its preliminary objection be joined to the merits.
8ème chambre 3ème section
69d948bdcdc6046d47ce1b7a
10 avril 2026
TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE [Localité 1] ■ 8ème chambre 3ème section N° RG 24/15706 N° Portalis 352J-W-B7I-C6QPW N° MINUTE : [1] [1] Copies certifiées conformes délivrées le : à Me MERLE, Me
Avis
CADA:20162817
8 septembre 2016
Monsieur X a saisi la commission d'accès aux documents administratifs, par courrier enregistré à son secrétariat le 3 juin 2016, à la suite du refus opposé par le maire de Meillerie à sa demande de communication
2ème chambre
66c58310784a89285d3f3371
19 août 2024
TOULOUSE APPELANT [M] [P] VEUVE [Y] veuve [Y] Représentée par Me Laurence GARNIER de la SELAS SELAS CAYOL CAHEN TREMBLAY & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de PARIS Représentée par Me Flavie DE MEERLEER
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC004511804
29 avril 2008
On 8 August 2007 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC003198603
18 mai 2006
On 15 July 2005 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received and the applicant was invited to submit written observations in reply by 20 September 2005
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0514DEC003234806
14 mai 2009
On 2 June 2008 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received.
ECLI:CEDH:002-7276
8 février 2011
(c) Due consideration by a domestic tribunal – The applicants’ cases had been examined on the merits at first instance and on appeal.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC003619902
2 mars 2006
, Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 23 July 2002, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0104DEC002334003
4 janvier 2007
Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 28 June 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
ECLI:CEDH:002-474
14 juin 2011
(b) Merits – The applicants’ time to appeal had been reduced from twenty days to nine days.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0607DEC002058303
7 juin 2007
On 19 July 2006 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0208DEC002289505
8 février 2007
As the applicant’s observations on the admissibility and merits had not been received by the indicated time-limit, on 4 May 2006 the applicant was advised by registered mail that the failure to submit
ECLI:CEDH:002-616
14 décembre 2010
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0110DEC002793003
10 janvier 2008
, Deputy Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 14 June 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC002108903
11 septembre 2007
On 15 September 2006 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906DEC000140506
6 septembre 2007
On 17 November 2006 the Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits of the application were received.
7ème sous-section jugeant seule
CETAT:CETATEXT000018005990
2 avril 2007
dispositions que tant l'avancement de grade des ingénieurs de l'armement que leur inscription préalable au tableau élaboré à cette fin ne constituent pas un droit et relèvent d'une appréciation des mérites