Croatia (referral) - 25703/11 Judgment 28.11.2013 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-3-c Defence through legal assistance Alleged denial of access to lawyer of applicant’s own choosing: case referred to the

Azerbaijan , no. 27309/14, 25   July 2019), and the alleged breach of the right to a reasoned decision (see, for example, Mazahir Jafarov v.   Azerbaijan , no. 39331/09, 2 April 2020).

On 9 November 2000 he lodged a complaint with the public prosecutor’s office concerning the alleged attacks.

He further alleged under Article 5 § 5 of the Convention that he had had no right to compensation in domestic law for the alleged violations of Article 5.

  Mr Dönmüş alleged that after being arrested, he had been taken to the gendarmerie station in Silvan (Turkey), where gendarmes had tied his hands behind his back and blindfolded him.

This was despite the fact that she had always maintained the contrary and had not admitted to the alleged offence.

Apparently the applicant alleged that he had not been informed in clear terms of the charges preferred against him by the prosecution.

    The present application concerns an alleged violation of the right to a   fair hearing on account of the alleged failure of the Constitutional Court to address one of the objections

He also alleged that his extradition would breach his right to respect for his family life. 3.

She also complained of the fact that she had been prevented from adducing further evidence before the Judicial Division of the Supreme Court in so far as she was not allowed to have access to it.

    On 19 March 2008 the investigation unit of the Kirovskiy district of Yekaterinburg received K.T.’s complaint concerning the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment. 16.

on 21 June 2021   SECOND SECTION Application no. 16022/20 Ömer GÜVEN against Turkey lodged on 18 March 2020 communicated on 2 June 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged

    The alleged substantive violation of Article 2 on account of the death of Şener Can 1.     Alleged involvement of the State agents into the killing 22.

The offence alleged was one under Article 133 of the Criminal Code of 1968, which provided for up to one year’s imprisonment.

The applicant also alleged that he had been threatened with electric shocks if he did not confess.

    Alleged violation of Article 3 of the Convention 19.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 2 OF THE CONVENTION 42.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 3 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION 36.

Inquiry into the alleged ill-treatment 126.