who had been left without legal representation, had therefore no way of knowing that they had a new time-frame within which to find a lawyer who might be persuaded to file a cassation appeal on their behalf

    Did the applicant have standing to bring the present application before the Court in the name and on behalf of her daughter M.A., who was the direct victim of the alleged rape (see, for instance

However, his heirs, who are also applicants in the same application, expressed their wish to continue the application on his behalf as well.

    On 10 April 2008 the applicant was arrested on suspicion of membership of a terrorist organisation, illegal possession of explosives on behalf of that organisation and possession of a fake

She alleged that she had been unaware of the contents of the parcels, which she had been carrying on behalf of someone else.

The Court first notes that the second applicant as the heir of the first applicant wished to continue the present proceedings on behalf of her late husband and finds that there are no obstacles for her

The second applicant had been the international spokesperson of a European committee campaigning on behalf of Kurdish prisoners and human rights in Iran.

communicated to the Government, the applicants’ representative notified the Court that the applicants had died after having signed the authority forms but before the applications had been lodged on their behalf

On 13 August 1998 the first applicant took Fouad with him to the Netherlands where, on 24   August   1998, he applied for a residence permit on behalf of Fouad for the purposes of family reunion

further complained under Article 6 about the violation of his right to a fair trial in that the domestic court had wrongly assessed the evidence, had failed to obtain attendance of certain witnesses on behalf

On 24 November 1988, using its right of pre-emption and claiming that Mr Beyeler had failed to inform the ministry that in 1977 the painting had been bought on his behalf, Italy bought the painting for

THE LAW On 14   June   2011 the Court received the following declaration, signed on the applicant’s behalf by his representative: “I, Ernest Wenerski, note that the Government of Poland are prepared

Decision 21.1.2014 [Section II] Article 35 Article 35-3 Abuse of the right of petition Representative’s failure to inform Court that he had lodged two separate applications concerning the same facts on behalf

The facts of the case, as submitted on behalf of the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

In particular he should have shown a certain neutrality, and he had a duty of discretion when acting on behalf of the community he represented.

By a letter of 18   April   2008 the applicant’s representative informed the Court that he no longer acted in these matters on behalf of the applicant.

violation established on account of the failure of the courts to deploy relevant and sufficient grounds in reviewing the lawfulness of dismissal of public official for having issued a press release on behalf

The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representative, who was invited to submit his observations on behalf of the applicants. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.

Following several extraordinary appeals, initiated by the prosecutor on behalf of the applicant, the amnesty proceedings were reopened and on 18   November 2013 the Chișinău Court of Appeal finally