CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012JUD003003006
12 octobre 2010
On 23 March 2004 the Governor again informed the applicants about further delays in the proceedings. 17.
Page 102 sur 868
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1220JUD003501997
20 décembre 2001
As regard the conduct of the applicant, the Court cannot find that any delays were attributable to him.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416JUD001077221
16 avril 2024
On 23 February 2017 the bailiff lodged a request for delay penalties with the Bârlad District Court.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1109DEC003188803
9 novembre 2004
Lord Justice Carnwath noted the delay in bringing the proceedings: “In this case it seems to me that the important issue is the delay in bringing the proceedings.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0201JUD004436302
1 février 2007
The applicants maintained that such delays were in breach of the domestic law.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0831JUD001208516
31 août 2018
It also noted that the Land Office had maintained active correspondence with the applicant and had therefore not caused any undue delays. 16 .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1201DEC002726795
1 décembre 1997
In addition, should that detention last longer than 8 days without a court-martial being convened, a report (a "delay report") on the necessity for further delay shall be made by the person's Commanding
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0410JUD002107105
10 avril 2008
The same holds true in relation to his new complaint about the absence of an effective domestic remedy in respect of delays in enforcement.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1016JUD001373203
16 octobre 2007
The applicant argued that there had been unjustified delays in the investigation and at the trial.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-6717
28 mars 2000
Finally, the Government acknowledged that applicant had not in any way contributed to the delay in the fixing of his appeal to the Supreme Court.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-49218
10 mars 1976
Commission on 17 December 1973 declared the application admissible and after having examined all the elements of the case expressed the opinion in its report adopted on 9 July 1975 that there were no delays
soc
61372397cd5801467740bc82
16 mai 2001
Delay, 64100 Bayonne, 5 / de Mme Marie-Christine X..., demeurant ..., 6 / de Mme MaIté B..., demeurant ..., 7 / de Mlle Bernadette C..., demeurant "Larrun", chemin Errepira, 64210 Guethary,
chambre 1-3
69d06868cdc6046d470bf4c9
21 janvier 2025
Martine Avocat (B242) ET : SAS METRON, dont le siège social est 75 rue de Lourmel 75015 Paris - RCS B 794167593 Partie défenderesse : assistée de Me Karine LAVOREL Avocat (Paris) et comparant par Me Delay-Peuch
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243296
25 avril 2025
mainly complain that Mr S. was only prosecuted for infliction of minor injuries, that alleged religious motives for the attack were not taken account and investigated and that there was a considerable delay
ECLI:CEDH:001-49328
2 avril 1992
before the European Court of Human Rights in pursuance of Article 48 (art. 48) of the Convention; Whereas in his application the applicant complained inter alia of the delay
ECLI:CEDH:001-217174
6 avril 2022
Was the delay in admitting the applicant to a hospital excessive and contrary to Article 5 § 1 ( Pankiewicz v. Poland , no. 34151/04, §§ 44-45, 12 February 2008)?
ECLI:CEDH:001-218148
1 juin 2022
The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention about the delay in the enforcement of the final judgment in question which prevented her from seeing her child for more than 4 years and, in particular
ECLI:CEDH:001-180597
8 janvier 2018
The Saarbrucken Regional Court declared as “served” three months of the prison sentence, owing to the delays in the criminal proceedings between 29 January 2013 and 11 February 2015.
Tribunal Administratif de Lyon
ORTA_2513503_20260430
30 avril 2026
F..., représentés par Me Delay, concluent au rejet de la requête et à ce qu’une somme de 2 000 euros soit mise à la charge du requérant au titre de l’article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative.
ORTA_2515892_20260320
20 mars 2026
B..., représenté par Me Delay, conclut au rejet de la requête et à ce qu’une somme de 2 500 euros soit mise à la charge de la requérante au titre de l’article L. 761-1 du code de justice administrative