Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1129JUD002654102
29 novembre 2007
29 novembre 2007
On 13 February 2002 the Appeal Court overturned that decision dismissing the charges because the prosecution had become time-barred.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC003323509
4 octobre 2011
4 octobre 2011
The applicant was thus unable properly to conduct his defence because he did not know the case against him. 20.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:1004DEC001347787
4 octobre 1989
4 octobre 1989
They had no legal representation, having been refused legal aid because the Magistrates considered the interests of justice did not require it.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0306DEC006791401
6 mars 2003
6 mars 2003
Invoking Article 14, the applicants claim to be discriminated against because of their political and other views which differ from the ones advocated by the Church and because they do not
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003642897
21 octobre 1998
21 octobre 1998
The applicant's defence immediately asked for an adjournment because of the problem that had arisen concerning the ability of PC G to testify.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0422DEC002337994
22 avril 1998
22 avril 1998
Because of the unification of the parcels he could no longer keep this promise. Instead a partition map by a surveyor had to be drawn up which involved considerable expenses.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-150873
5 janvier 2015
5 janvier 2015
Relying on Article 8 of the Convention, the applicants complained that the search order had been unlawful because there had been no reason for conducting such a search.
Source officielle1ère chambre civile A
603267939966ae9c4e47b43a
8 février 2018
8 février 2018
clôture de l'instruction : 08 décembre 2017 Date des plaidoiries tenues en audience publique : 13 décembre 2017 Date de mise à disposition : 08 février 2018 Audience tenue par Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE C
6035ac2d3237d9104ae784c5
18 mars 2016
18 mars 2016
Délégué syndical ouvrier) muni d'un pouvoir DÉBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 05 Février 2016 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE C
6035ff34749c6c648a37ba99
15 janvier 2016
15 janvier 2016
COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président - Isabelle BORDENAVE, conseiller - Chantal THEUREY-PARISOT, conseiller ARRÊT : CONTRADICTOIRE Prononcé publiquement
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE C
603615c7f7d73679c2d3178d
18 décembre 2015
18 décembre 2015
Me Philippe BOULISSET, avocat au barreau D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE * * * DÉBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 06 Novembre 2015 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCHAMBRE SOCIALE C
60364548ae8bffa6ee8267f5
20 novembre 2015
20 novembre 2015
COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : - Jean-Louis BERNAUD, président - Isabelle BORDENAVE, conseiller - Chantal THEUREY-PARISOT, conseiller ARRÊT : CONTRADICTOIRE Prononcé publiquement
Source officielleSécurité sociale
60364ce462ec6aae231b5653
17 novembre 2015
17 novembre 2015
R] [U], munie d'un pouvoir PARTIES CONVOQUÉES LE : 26 janvier 2015 DÉBATS EN AUDIENCE PUBLIQUE DU : 13 Octobre 2015 COMPOSITION DE LA COUR LORS DES DÉBATS ET DU DÉLIBÉRÉ : Jean-Louis BERNAUD
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000220205
4 décembre 2008
4 décembre 2008
Mr T. was absent from this hearing because he did not live at the address to which the summons had been mailed. 7.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2054168-2173715
10 juillet 2007
10 juillet 2007
Between 5 October 2004 and 11 October 2005 Mr Paladi made a total of 10 requests to be released, which were all refused, notably because the courts considered that he might reoffend or abscond,
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0326DEC005958000
26 mars 2002
26 mars 2002
The Board’s reasons for this conclusion were that the applicant’s income support claim was invalid because it had been obtained by fraudulent means.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0605DEC006439801
5 juin 2007
5 juin 2007
The prosecutor referred the request to the public prosecutor of the Metro because it was Metro police officers who had allegedly ill-treated the applicant. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0308DEC006405600
8 mars 2005
8 mars 2005
On 16 April 1999 the police arrested and detained the applicant because they suspected that he had shot clients at a roadside café with whom he had quarrelled.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0316DEC003373896
16 mars 1999
16 mars 1999
On 26 February 1987 the Regional Primary Education Board of the Prefecture of Xanthi imposed on the applicant a disciplinary penalty of one year's suspension, because "in his capacity as
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-628
21 janvier 2011
21 janvier 2011
They had thus failed to take due account of the applicant’s vulnerability as an asylum-seeker and must be held responsible – because of their inaction and their failure to process his asylum application
Source officiellePage 102 sur 1499