CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

30 676 résultats pour « Bothner »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235309

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2024

1 juillet 2024

the Court to the Committee in these cases and to the violations of Articles 1 of Protocol no. 1 and 13 of the Convention, established on account of the operation of rent control legislation related both

Source officielle

Page 100 sur 1534

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-193297

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2019

24 avril 2019

On 1 February 1983, the applicant rented (under title of temporary emphyteusis) both No. 31 and 32, Żejtun Street, Marsaxlokk for a period of twenty ‑ one years at the same above ‑ mentioned

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248475

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2026

14 janvier 2026

The applicant has two daughters with a Lithuanian national, who were born in 2017 and 2020, and who both hold French and Lithuanian nationalities.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-915780-941752

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2004

22 janvier 2004

  On 31 January 2000 notice to quit was served on the family requiring them to vacate both plots, on the ground that Michael Maloney and the applicant’s children – including his adult sons – misbehaved

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1015JUD000601616

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 2024

15 octobre 2024

He complains under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the fact that, by virtue of the Access to Justice Act 1999, the order for costs made against him included both “success

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9689

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2014

8 juillet 2014

In their applications to the European Court both applicants complained that their continuing imprisonment violated Article 5 §   1 of the Convention as no there was no form of review available to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11476

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 1999

16 décembre 1999

Independent tribunal Imposition of a sentence of detention during Her Majesty’s pleasure with a tariff of fifteen years fixed by a member of the executive: violation Facts – The applicant and another boy, both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-225982

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2023

20 juin 2023

Although his injuries (a circular reddening on both wrist joints and a bruise on his right eyebrow) were recorded in the medical unit of the ITT, no investigation into his respective complaint was conducted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231519

Admin. suprême

6 février 2024

6 février 2024

Applicants 1-4 (see the appendix) are the parents of the three above-mentioned men, who brought, on 9 January 2012, the application both in their own name and on behalf of their missing sons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4671

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2003

9 octobre 2003

They were both found guilty and were awarded forty additional days’ custody and seven additional days’ custody respectively. They were subsequently refused leave to apply for judicial review.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-242603

Admin. suprême

4 mars 2025

4 mars 2025

His challenge was rejected both at first instance and on appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243695

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2025

13 mai 2025

Hungary [GC], no. 20261/12, §   120, ECHR 2016; see, also, Vujović and Lipa D.O.O. , §§ 39-44; and Madžarović and Others , §§ 92, and 94-95, both cited above)?

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13645

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2022

3 mai 2022

The Government had also referred to both remedies without, however, clarifying which of the two had been applicable to the applicant’s case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244948

Admin. suprême

29 août 2025

29 août 2025

It further observed that the applicant had been inconsistent in her statements, noting that she had said both that she had asked the police officers to allow her to accompany them to the station, and,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-249686

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2026

20 mars 2026

    He suffers from several medical conditions, in particular glaucoma in both eyes, lipomatosis and prostate enlargement.

Source officielle
TA

6ème Chambre

DTA_2304406_20230926

Administratif

26 septembre 2023

26 septembre 2023

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête enregistrée le 22 juin 2023, Mme A D, représentée par Me Bohner, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler l'arrêté du 20 janvier 2023 par lequel le préfet du Haut-Rhin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-248224

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2025

16 décembre 2025

The application concerns the first applicant’s alleged deportation in the absence of a removal order and the second applicant’s threatened removal to Iran, both without an adequate assessment by the domestic

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-182968

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2018

16 avril 2018

The proceedings concerning both his threatened expulsion and extradition are pending before the Constitutional Court (applications nos. 2016/5266 and   2017/29246).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3524

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2006

11 janvier 2006

Both applicants were thus compelled to join SID and that compulsion struck at the very substance of their freedom of association.

Source officielle
TA

Reconduite à la frontière

DTA_2204361_20220718

Administratif

18 juillet 2022

18 juillet 2022

Bohn La République mande et ordonne à la préfète du Bas-Rhin, en ce qui la concerne ou à tous commissaires de justice à ce requis en ce qui concerne les voies de droit commun contre les parties privées

Source officielle