Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
613724d8cd58014677418d5d
21 février 2007
21 février 2007
relations publiques de l'unité respiratoire, a été licenciée le 22 avril 2002 pour motif économique par la société Glaxosmithkline, société née de la fusion des sociétés Glaxo Wellcome et Smithkline Beecham
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229069
30 octobre 2023
30 octobre 2023
lodged on 29 August 2018 communicated on 30 October 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the authorities’ alleged failure to effectively investigate the applicant’s husband’s death because
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-187147
29 septembre 2018
29 septembre 2018
In 2008, in a final and binding court judgment it was held that, because the envisaged transaction had not materialised, the land registry entry could be removed if the applicants’ deposit was paid back
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214177
17 novembre 2021
17 novembre 2021
After the applicant hired an advocate who lodged an appeal, the enforcement order was quashed, and the proceedings discontinued because the local authority’s claim for communal charges became statute barred
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179985
8 décembre 2017
8 décembre 2017
On 30 October 2012 the first-instance court decided to discontinue the proceedings because the prosecution became time-barred.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-165522
7 juillet 2016
7 juillet 2016
The Regional Court rejected the appeal without an examination of the merits because the applicant did not attend the hearing, relying on Article 329 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which provided
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179678
27 novembre 2017
27 novembre 2017
The applicant complains, under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention, that in the administrative proceedings he was ordered to pay the taxes due on the importation of motor vehicles because the
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181086
1 février 2018
1 février 2018
That court decided so because it had considered that the company J. was not the legal successor of the company D.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1115DEC005781300
15 novembre 2007
15 novembre 2007
The difference in treatment between the two techniques was justified because, as pointed out above, the same objections could not be raised against the homologous method as against the heterologous one
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0204DEC002095303
4 février 2010
4 février 2010
However, the decision had been taken in breach of the procedure prescribed by law because no report on the administrative offence had been drawn up and because the first applicant had not been allowed
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0328DEC007225211
28 mars 2017
28 mars 2017
conviction but also because of the lengthy criminal proceedings against him. 19.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC005288419
23 mars 2021
23 mars 2021
He was in custody not because of the gravity of his original offending but because of the risk that the breach of his licence had created for the public.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409DEC003488606
9 avril 2013
9 avril 2013
On 3 December 2004 he was discharged from the hospital because his mental health had improved. 8.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0711JUD005359499
11 juillet 2002
11 juillet 2002
The applicants' lawyer refused to resume the hearing on 5 April 1996 because he had to appear before another court, and on 23 April 1996 because he was engaged in a pre-election meeting of his party
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181093
29 janvier 2018
29 janvier 2018
Such a breach could have been remedied only by amending the criminal charges, but that had been impossible because the second applicant had died.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1013DEC002028309
13 octobre 2009
13 octobre 2009
The second applicant added that she had been bullied at school because she was Kurdish and she had therefore stopped attending school in September 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0709DEC006348600
9 juillet 2002
9 juillet 2002
Immediately upon his conviction the applicant was relieved from serving the sentence partly because of the expiry of a statutory limitation period and partly because of an amnesty law of 1997.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0601JUD001204902
1 juin 2006
1 juin 2006
On 14 May 1999 the hearing was postponed until 10 September 1999 because the judge was engaged in unrelated proceedings. 11.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628JUD000605810
28 juin 2016
28 juin 2016
He then requested that they all drive to the police station because he wanted to speak to the officers’ supervisor.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-155555
26 mai 2015
26 mai 2015
Germany , because the European Court of Human Rights had clarified in the Marckx judgment of 1979 (no.
Source officiellePage 100 sur 1499