CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1112JUD004509207
12 novembre 2013
On 26 February 2007 the Court of Appeal upheld the decision of the lower court and rejected the applicant’s arguments that Article 6.147 § 2 of the Civil Code had to be applied by awarding
Page 10 sur 11
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1126JUD002218603
26 novembre 2009
ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL NO. 1 17.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1014JUD003110206
14 octobre 2014
There has accordingly been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention. II. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 13 OF THE CONVENTION 57.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1124JUD003841513
24 novembre 2015
On the same day the Osijek County Court accepted the request of the State Attorney’s Office and ordered the applicant’s pre-trial detention under Article 123 § 1(1) of the Code of Criminal
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0707JUD001227803
7 juillet 2009
Under Article 241 of the Code, the proceedings were suspended until the Constitutional Court had given its ruling. THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 33.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0717JUD000658707
17 juillet 2018
312 at Izhevsk police station, a police officer, M., obtained from the applicant a confession to the crime, in accordance with Article 142 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214424
23 novembre 2021
(b) Was the applicants’ pre-trial detention compatible with the requirements of Article 5 § 3 of the Convention?
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD004942609
15 novembre 2016
In line with Article 6.147 § 2 of the Civil Code (see paragraph 38 below), when property subject to restitution is transferred and the person who transferred it has acted in good faith, he or she
ECLI:CEDH:001-205997
16 octobre 2020
In particular, the parties are invited to answer this question taking into account, - on the one hand, Article 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires “concrete evidence
ECLI:CEDH:001-116767
22 janvier 2013
Lastly, the applicant complains under Article 13 that he did not have effective remedies in respect of his grievances under Articles 3 and 5 of the Convention concerning his alleged torture and unacknowledged
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0404JUD002893214
4 avril 2019
can last as long as there is need for it but not longer than provided under Article 133 of this Code.”
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD005013012
5 juillet 2016
Apparently, at the time the arrest warrant was issued the applicant had a lawyer appointed for him, as required by Article 527 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 9.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0106DEC001433605
6 janvier 2011
Article 97 § 3 of the 1952 Code of Civil Procedure, superseded by Article 124 § 4 of the 2007 Code of Civil Procedure, provided that claims for judicial declarations that legally relevant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0917JUD007546010
17 septembre 2019
Article 238 of the same Code empowered the criminal courts to refuse to admit any unlawfully obtained evidence.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0615JUD001361012
15 juin 2021
The court held, with reference to, inter alia , Article 136 of Code of Criminal Procedure (“CCP” – see paragraph 26 below), that, since there was a reasonable suspicion that the applicant had committed
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0709JUD000882409
9 juillet 2015
Article 55 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure stipulates that a witness may refuse to answer any questions the reply to which would subject him, or one of his close relatives, to the risk
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919JUD006664110
19 septembre 2017
On 31 October 2006 the High State Prosecutor charged eight defendants with reckless endangerment under Article 338 § 2 in connection with Article 327 §§ 1 and 3 of the Criminal Code (see
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD001797805
27 mai 2014
Article 6.271 of the Civil Code, as in force from 1 July 2001, provides that damage caused by the unlawful acts of a public authority must be compensated for by the State, irrespective of
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0922JUD001307407
22 septembre 2020
On 22 November 2005, after the completion of a pre-investigation inquiry under Article 144 of the Code of Criminal procedure, the prosecutor of the Tulun inter ‑ district
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1009JUD004887919
9 octobre 2025
The relevant provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure (2012), as in force at the material time, provided as follows: Article 433. Scope of a review by the court of cassation “1.