The Court also observes that, even after Mr K.’s death, the applicant association did not make any attempt to raise the complaint about the circumstances leading to that tragic event before the national

Bulgaria (application no. 55057/00)   Violation Article 13 The applicant, Valentin Kotzev Sidjimov, is a Bulgarian national who was born in 1973 and lives in Pazardjik (Bulgaria).

The applicants also made accessory complaints under assorted Articles of the Convention. THE LAW 1. As regards the claims by Mrs R.V.

For convenience this judgment will continue to refer to Mr Valentin Konstantinov Kotsev as the “first applicant” although his heirs are today to be regarded as having that status (see Kozacıoğlu v.

By letters dated 11 January 2013 the Government informed the Court that they proposed to make declarations with a view to resolving the issues raised by the applications.

    The applicant, Ms Valentina Ivanovna Mironova, is a Russian national, who was born in 1963 and lives in Tolmachevo, a village in the Leningrad Region.

: “If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made

    On 12 May 1998 the applicant was interviewed by the police in the absence of a lawyer and made self-incriminating statements.

    The applicant, Mr Valentin Iustin Popa, is a Romanian national who was born in 1951 and lives in Oradea.

- N° Portalis DB3F-W-B7H-JIOF JUGEMENT DU 14 Janvier 2025 DEMANDERESSES : Madame [R] [T] née le [Date naissance 8] 1963 à [Localité 24] (93) [Adresse 16] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Claire VALENTIN

inline-block } .s90F5E8FB { width:214.48pt; display:inline-block } .sDEA786DA { width:210.67pt; display:inline-block } SECOND SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 65106/01 by Valentin

    Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues. THE LAW I.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE VALENCIENNES POLE SOCIAL JUGEMENT DU HUIT JUILLET DEUX MIL VINGT QUATRE N° RG 22/00299 - N° Portalis DBZT-W-B7G-FZHI N°MINUTE : 24/287 Le vingt six avril deux mil vingt quatre

Mr   Medvedsky made no claim   Moskalenko v.

Instead, the Ministry had made an “excusable error” ( errore scusabile ) on account of the lack of clarity of the scope of the authorisation (see paragraph 6 above).

    The Court further observes that the applicants made use of the existing domestic remedy.

He also alleged that the SIZO doctor warned him that if he wished to remain safe he should not make any complaints. 4 .

been applied to certain witnesses upon their requests in accordance with the law; the defendant has been accused of having inflicted bodily injuries with a view to intimidating the victim, which fact makes

s299839C6 { width:212.77pt; display:inline-block } .s7602FED2 { width:18.21pt; display:inline-block } .sC1AC44A4 { width:228.11pt; display:inline-block } FIRST SECTION DECISION Application no. 8810/09 Valentina