SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DES ENONCIATIONS DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE (PAU, 24 JANVIER 1975) QUE LA SOCIETE ETABLISSEMENTS THOU (THOU) A CONCLU LE 18 JUIN 1968 PLUSIEURS CONTRATS AVEC EGUIMENDYA

In that respect, those safeguards ensured the proper functioning of an effective political democracy and thus represented a preliminary step for any parliamentary autonomy.

In the course of those proceedings, the applicant was not granted a visa to visit Norway and was thus, unlike the aunt, unable to attend the court hearings in person.

In those circumstances, the preventive detention had been incompatible with the aims of the applicant’s initial conviction.

She was thus obliged to pay for private specialised assistance. The administrative courts dismissed her claims.

It was therefore a presumption that the pollution had become potentially harmful to the health and well-being of those exposed to it.

The circumstances of the present case were entirely distinguishable from those in G.I.E.M. S.R.L. and Others v.

In the course of those proceedings, the applicant was ultimately found guilty of illicit drugs trafficking and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment.

Their appeals against those restrictions were dismissed.

State agents to abuse the rights of those within their control with virtual impunity.

and those who did not.

Rather, it had, in principle, been sufficient to allow an effective opportunity for the applicant’s lawyer to analyse the recordings and text messages in order to identify and then listen or read those

Taking the view that there were parallels between the applicant’s actions and those of the applicants in the cases of Guja v. Moldova [GC] and Heinisch v.

Certain taxpayers had opted to follow that advice and had thus not been subjected in 2005 to a tax bill that was higher than the sum corresponding to the relevant tax year.

Those proceedings were still pending at the time of the Court’s judgment.

The applicants belonged to either of those two groups.

These proceedings were thus not comparable to those prevailing in the case of Moreira Ferreira (cited above) .

In the present case, it was the applicant’s own inaction that had led to the severance of ties between him and his child, and thus seemed to have prompted the outcome of the case against him.