CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 518 résultats pour « Thierry THAVE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC001407904

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

    Secondly, even if it were the case that there was no statutory basis upon which the applicant could have obtained an Order preventing disclosure of his identity (and it is clear that section

Page 10 sur 126

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113JUD006568113

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2015

13 janvier 2015

It only subjected that activity to conditions, which they were not unable to meet.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD003203610

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

He submitted that there had been at least 100 detainees in Unit 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC001235004

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

They were informed that they would be strip-searched and that if they refused they would be denied their visit to Mr O'Neill.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

61372204cd580146773f982b

Cassation

8 décembre 1993

8 décembre 1993

Thierry, conseiller rapporteur, M. Renard-Payen, conseiller, M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0324DEC003563123

Admin. suprême

24 mars 2026

24 mars 2026

That did not, however, mean that individuals could be subjected to stricter requirements of knowledge than public authorities, as long as they provided those authorities with all the information that had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1113DEC003621919

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2025

13 novembre 2025

Therefore, it could not be used to conclude that the existence of that particular remedy was sufficiently certain not only in theory but also in practice at the time the relevant proceedings were concluded

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1206DEC001198202

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2007

6 décembre 2007

    The Government submitted hand-written statements of prison inspectors Kh. and L. dated 20 January 2006, in which they had certified that in 2001 there had been no more than 28 persons in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0408DEC002910007

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2014

8 avril 2014

They pointed out that the Milan Court of Appeal had affirmed that there was no provision specifically requiring the latter to prevent the use of drugs by prisoners, and considered that in so doing the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD002303202

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2005

6 octobre 2005

The person seeking compensation will thus have to prove, firstly, that there has been a delay in the proceedings, secondly, that damage has occurred, and, thirdly, that there is a causal link between the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0911DEC003860112

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

P 20/09) in which that court declared the previous regulation unconstitutional, holding that there were not sufficient reasons to lower the minimum wage with respect to prisoners.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0911DEC000171006

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2012

11 septembre 2012

On 8   December 2005 they replied that they were not in a position to ensure better conditions for detainees. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1107DEC004985999

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2000

7 novembre 2000

    where the Indictment Division has stated in the judgment that there are no grounds for an investigation; 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0530JUD007115201

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2006

30 mai 2006

They argued that the three-year prescription period for the purposes of a compensation claim in tort based on the excessive length of proceedings could run from a date later than the date on which a final

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC006261700

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

as it would not be sufficiently persuaded that there was a risk of repetition.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

61372152cd580146773f2cbd

Cassation

18 décembre 1990

18 décembre 1990

Y..., Bernard de Saint-Affrique, Thierry, Averseng, Lemontey, Gélineau-Larrivet, conseillers, M. Savatier, conseiller référendaire, M.

Source officielle
CC

civ1

61372217cd580146773fa249

Cassation

18 mai 1994

18 mai 1994

Thierry, Renard-Payen, Lemontey, Chartier, Mme Gié, M. Ancel, conseillers, Mme Catry, conseiller référendaire, M.

Source officielle
CC

soc

61372219cd580146773fa3bc

Cassation

31 mars 1994

31 mars 1994

Thierry Y..., demeurant 10 Haut des Combes, Rive de Gier (Loire), 12 / de M. Pierrick C... Donato, demeurant ...; 13 / de M. Jean-Louis M..., demeurant ..., 14 / de M.

Source officielle
CC

civ3

6137227ccd580146773fd91e

Cassation

4 octobre 1995

4 octobre 1995

Thierry X..., demeurant ..., 6 / de M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018DEC002434204

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

He further argued that the proceedings were not of particular complexity and that there were no reasons for such a delay.

Source officielle