CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 861 résultats pour « Stuart White »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217156

Admin. suprême

8 avril 2022

8 avril 2022

In particular, the fee for appeal or cassation is 2% of what is considered to be the value of the claim brought before the courts.

Source officielle

Page 10 sur 194

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0706DEC002750795

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2000

6 juillet 2000

In addition, he was calling other inmates to start a riot.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113734

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2011

12 avril 2011

Ultimately, having no other option and in a state of haze, the applicant checked out of the ĆMC.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-118375

Admin. suprême

11 mars 2013

11 mars 2013

Her written statement to that end was certified by a notary public in Moscow.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC006841601

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2004

6 avril 2004

McDonald's is directly involved in this economic imperialism, which keeps most black people poor and hungry while many whites grow fat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD001016113

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

He asked me if I would do that again (she needs to be interrupted because she is speaking indistinctly while sobbing) ... [The next day] ... I told my mum what he had done to me.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11973

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2018

31 mai 2018

Romania , no. 33234/12, 31 May 2018] Facts – The applicants were detained by the United States (US) Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) at the start of the “war on terror” following the 11   September

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11974

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2018

31 mai 2018

Lithuania , 46454/11, 31 May 2018] Facts – The applicants were detained by the United States (US) Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) at the start of the “war on terror” following the 11 September 2001 attacks

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2697

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2007

3 mai 2007

The case investigator had made clear his bias from the start. A victim who identified some of the assailants had ended up himself being charged.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2223122-2379647

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2008

8 janvier 2008

  In 1993 the association asked a committee of nine people, including the applicant, to start liaising with a university in Iraq.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0701DEC004462598

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 2004

1 juillet 2004

Such evidence were the applicant’s statement during his questioning on 28 March 1997, the statement made in his father’s appeal of 19 December 1997, the statement of his co-accused and the fact that six

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:0312DEC001194586

Admin. suprême

12 mars 1987

12 mars 1987

          On 29 November 1985 the Stuttgart Administrative Court dismissed the second applicant's action in the substantive proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0111DEC005948115

Admin. suprême

11 janvier 2022

11 janvier 2022

The Act provides for a party a right to receive compensation from State funds whenever judicial proceedings concerning that party have been excessively long. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0919DEC000387714

Admin. suprême

19 septembre 2017

19 septembre 2017

in the period after notification Google Inc. did not know, and had no reason to believe, that what it did caused the publication of a defamatory statement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0303DEC005239199

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2005

3 mars 2005

While running he had told Officer Dekker what the matter was. Officer Boonstra had been following at a distance of about ten metres.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12189

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2018

9 novembre 2018

At the start of his first police interview and at the beginning of each of his subsequent interviews and examinations, the applicant had received express information that his statements could be used in

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-201496

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2020

28 janvier 2020

The reporter explained that “Browder was raining compliments upon Navalnyy, seeking to convince him to start joint ‘greenmail’ operations – this is what corporate blackmail is called”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0412JUD006573101

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2006

12 avril 2006

According to the government’s Green and White Papers entitled respectively “Options for Equality in State Pension Age” (Cm 1723, December 1991) and “Equality in State Pension Age” (Cm 2420, December 1993

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-166724

Admin. suprême

22 août 2016

22 août 2016

It is most unlikely however that white people are in a minority among travellers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0320JUD004579113

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2018

20 mars 2018

They noted that while a number of questions had been put, the article had also contained statements which were unproven.

Source officielle