CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145862
3 juillet 2014
The applicant was brought before the Sabail District Court on the day of the arrest.
Page 10 sur 17
ECLI:CEDH:001-249829
24 mars 2026
Later, upon the request by the prosecution, the Sabail District Court changed the pre-trial detention by house arrest, in respect of all applicants.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0601JUD002350315
1 juin 2023
On 7 August 2014 the Sabail District Court authorised the investigating authorities to search the applicant organisation’s office and “other places of storage” and to seize legal, financial
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-177542
11 septembre 2017
requérants 24219/16 21/04/2016 Vahid Turab oglou KARIMOV 10/09/1987 Bakou Jugement du 28 avril 2015 du tribunal du district Khazar de Bakou Jugement du 11 mars 2016 du tribunal du district Sabail
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0305DEC001472208
5 mars 2019
On 20 March 2006 the applicant lodged a claim against the BCEA with the Sabail District Court, requesting the court to order the BCEA to grant him the permit. 10.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0731JUD001022613
31 juillet 2014
By a decision of 24 January 2013, the Sabayil District Court dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the temporary extradition order of 26 November 2012.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0722JUD000340910
22 juillet 2021
On 14 April 2009 the Nasimi District Court transferred the case file to the Sabail District Court, on the basis of territorial jurisdiction. 19.
ECLI:CEDH:001-179204
7 novembre 2017
According to the documents in the case file, the applicant was arrested on 15 January 2007, and on 17 January 2007 the Sabail District Court ordered his pre-trial detention.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13594
8 mars 2022
margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 260 March 2022 Sabani
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0625DEC001275913
25 juin 2024
Having received no response from AzTV, the applicant organisation lodged a civil claim with the Sabayil District Court, asking the court to find that AzTV’s inaction had been unlawful and
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1213DEC004284510
13 décembre 2022
The applicant lodged an action with the Sabayil District Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0507DEC000721112
7 mai 2024
The chairperson of the applicant organisation lodged a civil claim with the Sabayil District Court.
4ème chambre
DTA_2202201_20240216
16 février 2024
B, de Me Villard pour la commune de Dagneux et de Me Sabadel pour la communauté de communes de la Côtière à Montluel. M. B a présenté une note en délibéré, enregistrée le 24 janvier 2024.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0216JUD003238013
16 février 2023
On 26 September 2000 the head of the BCEA issued an order allocating 198.62 ha of land to the Sabail Municipality (“the Municipality”).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0715JUD006785112
15 juillet 2025
In response the BCEA instructed the Sabail District Executive Authority (“the SDEA”) to demolish the building. In November 2009 the State authorities began the demolition process.
ECLI:CEDH:001-152336
23 janvier 2015
The applicant was brought before the Sabail District Court on the day of his arrest.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1025JUD001609608
25 octobre 2011
Par un jugement du 13 décembre 2005, rendu après la tenue d’une audience publique, le juge pénal n o 2 de Sabadell acquitta la requérante et les autres accusés.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0203JUD003994107
3 février 2011
By a judgment of 23 February 1998 the Sabayil District Court allowed the applicant's claim, ordering his reinstatement in his previous job.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0920DEC003961918
20 septembre 2022
Cour de cassation, ce qui a entraîné l’adoption d’un nouvel ordre de quitter le territoire assorti d’une décision de maintien dans un lieu déterminé (paragraphe 8 ci-dessus) (voir, mutatis mutandis , Sabani
ECLI:CEDH:001-160102
7 janvier 2016
By a judgment of 13 February 2013 the Sabail District Court dismissed the applicant’s claim, finding that the statements made in the article were a manifestation of the author’s independent thought and