Poland, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Péter Paczolay , President ,   Gilberto Felici,   Raffaele Sabato , judges , and Viktoriya

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE   1 OF PROTOCOL No.   1 7.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt

. 1993, no. 1042, and of 17 March 1994 ( Abbate ), published in Cass. pen. 1995, 340). 3.

  Gayazova, a lawyer practising in Kazan; the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning the applicant’s alleged ill-treatment by public officials to the Russian Government (“the Government

DECISION Application no. 24129/17 Miralam HASHIMOV against Azerbaijan (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 7 March 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Péter

There is nothing in his submissions to suggest that he suffered any consequences from the alleged violation of the applicant’s rights or that his intention to purse the application before the Court has

András Péter LÉDERER 1984 Hungarian Budapest 23. László MAJTÉNYI 1950 Hungarian Budapest 24. Anna MÁRFFY 1993 Hungarian Budapest 25. Zsófia MOLDOVA 1975 Hungarian Budapest 26.

DECISION Application no. 1166/19 Anar Shahin MAMMADOV against Azerbaijan (see appended table) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 16 May 2024 as a Committee composed of:   Péter

SECTION DECISION Application no. 11841/21 Tom WEICKERT against Slovenia   The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 24   January 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Péter

Austria (application nos. 35673/97, 35674/97, 36082/97 and 37579/97) Violation Article 6 § 1 Walter Schweighofer, Hans-Dieter Rauch, Peter Heinemann and Josef Mach, all Austrian nationals, were convicted

The ill-treatment consisted in the applicants being briefly sprayed with pepper gas and kicked by a group of people. On 29 July 2015 the first applicant filed a criminal complaint.

  26 before the entry into force of Protocol No. 11), normal recourse should be had by an applicant to remedies which are available and sufficient to afford redress in respect of the breaches alleged

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   11 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

In his observations, the applicant also alleged a violation of Article 6 §   3 (a) of the Convention as he had not been informed promptly and in detail of the charges. 2.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   3 OF THE CONVENTION on account of confinement in a metal cage in the courtroom 7.

THE LAW ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 10 OF THE CONVENTION 22.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE   6 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION 6.

Hungary, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Georges Ravarani, President,   Marko Bošnjak,   Péter Paczolay, judges, and Liv Tigerstedt