Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231518
6 février 2024
6 février 2024
On 20 July 2021 and 16 March 2022 respectively the Kutaisi Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Georgia confirmed the revocation of the applicant’s title.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1905426-2010503
30 janvier 2007
30 janvier 2007
In March 1994 they were arrested and remanded in custody on suspicion of having hidden members of the illegal organisation PKK.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181925
5 mars 2018
5 mars 2018
On 31 March 2008 the second-instance Commission dismissed the applicant’s appeal and upheld the decision, finding that it had been in accordance with section 54 of the Act.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-231660
22 février 2024
22 février 2024
2023 the Constitutional Court considered that, in the absence of an appeal about the merits it was limited in its findings.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-147094
18 septembre 2014
18 septembre 2014
On 30 March 2008 the criminal case was assigned to the Serious Crimes Unit of the Prosecutor General’s Office.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-196113
28 août 2019
28 août 2019
In that application, which is still pending before the Court, notice of the complaint concerning Article 3 of the Convention was given to the respondent Government on 29 March 2017.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-202230
11 mars 2020
11 mars 2020
On 28 December 2016 the Rijeka Hospital delivered its findings, stating that the applicant suffered from a mental disorder (paranoid state) and that she had been emotionally abusing the child.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172637
8 mars 2017
8 mars 2017
36pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:center } .s3F59B822 { font-family:Arial; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Communicated on 8 March
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2367733-2542763
19 mai 2008
19 mai 2008
She entered the United Kingdom on 28 March 1998 under an assumed name. She was seriously ill, and was admitted to hospital.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-703661-712628
5 mars 2003
5 mars 2003
THE UNITED KINGDOM Wednesday 5 March 2003 at 9.00 a.m. The applicants The applications (nos.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68043-68511
24 mars 1999
24 mars 1999
TURKEY Wednesday, 24 March 1999 at 9 a.m. The applicant The case concerns an application (application no.
Source officiellePRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68423-68891
18 février 1999
18 février 1999
The case was referred to the Court by the first applicant on 10 March 1998, by the Government of the Republic of San Marino on 16 March 1998 and by the second applicant on 3 April 1998.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2384063-2558862
29 mai 2008
29 mai 2008
In January 2002 he was released on bail but, failing to appear at a hearing in March 2004, the trial court ordered his detention. He was re-arrested and placed in custody on 31 March 2004.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205995
15 octobre 2020
15 octobre 2020
At the end of the hearing, the trial court sentenced the applicant to life imprisonment, finding it established that he had introduced the inciter and the hitman to kill the victim.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-233060
13 mars 2024
13 mars 2024
It found, inter alia , that there was no evidence to sustain a finding that the applicant’s manager had been harassing her, sexually or otherwise. 3.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68446-68914
25 novembre 1999
25 novembre 1999
Ten of them were later convicted in jury trials before Gulating High Court ( lagmannsrett ), from November 1988 to March 1992, the so-called “boomerang cases”.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-159429
23 novembre 2015
23 novembre 2015
on the merits has been adopted or where a definitive finding on the merits has not yet become final, adoption of a definitive finding on the merits shall be suspended.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC003833306
18 mai 2010
18 mai 2010
On 9 March 2006 the Constitutional Court ( Ústavní soud ) declared the appeal inadmissible, finding that a fair balance between the general interest of the society and those of the applicant company
Source officiellecomm
6079d3e69ba5988459c59b31
15 juin 1999
15 juin 1999
(société Richard X...), spécialisée dans les constructions métalliques, a soumissionné, le 12 mars 1990, à un marché ouvert par la Chambre de commerce et d'industrie de Marseille, selon une procédure d'appel
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-145895
3 juillet 2014
3 juillet 2014
The District Court had not advanced convincing reasons for its finding that the applicant might interfere with the proceedings.
Source officiellePage 10 sur 1230