In contrast to position in the Prodan v.

    The applicant was born in 1929 and lives in Istanbul. 6.

B., is a Slovak national who was born in 2008 and lives in Košice. The application was brought on her behalf by her mother. She is represented before the Court by Ms   I.

The captives were lined up in rows in the building’s inner courtyard and were surrounded by journalists and bystanders.

The correspondence also revealed that the investigations in both cases were still pending in their early stages. 13.

In addition to this in the present case, as the domestic courts observed, the conditions set forth in the first paragraph of Article 1177 were not met by the applicant either.

    On 15 June 2004 a Chamber of the Fourth Section decided to join the applications in accordance with Rule 42 (1) of the Rules of the Court. THE FACTS I.

resident in Groningen.

In the case of Pasteli and others v.

In the case of Baronin and Others v.

  4(e)     An increase in rent or other charges for the use of a dwelling which does not exceed the average general yearly retail price index in the previous calendar year shall be considered

    In its reply to the complaint, the Petrich District Court stated, inter alia , that it had not destroyed the record cards for substitute administrative penalties whose retention periods had

    The fourth of those applicants, Mr Alexander Stefanov Panev, is a Bulgarian national born in 1961 and living in Sofia.

1961 and lives in Bakaly.

in Klaipėda.

late February 2014, mass protests (known as the Ukrainian Revolution of Dignity) culminated in the ousting of   Ukraine’s fourth President, Mr Yanukovych.

His daughter-in-law had gone to Adana in search of her husband. In Nizip he heard from Gaziantep that his son had been killed. 46.

In the case of Saliba and Others v.

    When the first and second applicants had visited their son in prison in the autumn of 2010, the latter confided in them that the prison security officers had started beating him (one of the